• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on the purpose of your visit.
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the IRPR, based on your personal assets and financial status.
• Pursuant to paragraph 220(a) of the IRPA, I am not satisfied that you have sufficient and available financial resources, without working in Canada, to pay the tuition fees for the course or program of studies that you intend to pursue.
Applicant is a male, married with children. Family will not be accompanying PA. File assessed. No previous travel history. Financial documents on file. I have concerns regarding PA ability to support studies in canada. see proof of funds. The applicant has failed to satisfy me that pursuing the selected program of study is reasonable given the high cost of international study in canada when weighed against the potential career/employment benefits after completion, and the local options available for similar studies. Given family ties or economic motives to remain in canada, the applicant incentives to remain in canada outweigh their ties to their home country. Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant would be a bona fide student in canada who will leave canada by the end of the period authorized to stay.
How do I address this in new application? Course is 3 years advance diploma at seneca after B.sc .How much fund will I show the VO?